A complete guide to modal verbs in English: can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will and would, with examples, common mistakes and exercises.

Modal verbs look easy until you have to use them. Nine short words, no endings, no conjugation… and still one of the biggest sources of mistakes in the Cambridge exams. I see it every week when I mark writing: «I don’t can», «she must cook dinner yesterday», «I would live in Madrid when I was a child».
This is the complete guide to modal verbs in English: what they are, how each one works, what they mean in context, how deductions are built, what perfect modals are, which mistakes learners really make (documented by Cambridge, not invented by me) and how they are tested at each level. At the end there are forty practice sentences with answers. Get comfortable, there is a lot here. Let’s get started! 🙂
A modal verb does not describe an action. It describes your attitude towards that action: whether you see it as possible, obligatory, advisable, likely or impossible. That is why the same sentence changes completely depending on the modal in front of it:
The main verb has not moved. Only the modal changes, and with it the whole message. That is the entire idea.
It is worth being precise here, because plenty of lists online mix different things together. Cambridge groups them in three:
| Group | Which ones |
|---|---|
| Core modal verbs | can, could, may, might, will, shall, would, should, must |
| Semi-modals | dare, need, ought to, used to |
| Verbs with modal meanings | have (got) to, be going to, be able to |
The nine in the first group are the ones that behave in a special way, and most of this guide is about them. The other two groups are summarised further down, and each will get its own post.
Get these five rules into your head and you avoid most of the mistakes. They are the same for all nine modals.
And one consequence of the fifth rule that is worth understanding: modals have no infinitive, no gerund and no participle. There is no «to can», no «canning», no «musted». When the grammar needs one of those forms, you switch to a verb with a modal meaning: be able to for can, have to for must.
| What you want to say | ✘ Impossible | ✔ Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Future of can | «I will can» | I will be able to help. |
| Past of must | «I musted» | I had to leave early. |
| Infinitive | «to can» | I’d love to be able to ski. |
| Gerund | «canning» | I hate not being able to help. |
| After another modal | «might can» | We might be able to come. |
| Form | Example |
|---|---|
| Affirmative | You should call her. |
| Negative | You shouldn’t call her. |
| Question | Should I call her? |
| Short answer | Yes, you should. / No, you shouldn’t. |
| Question tag | You should call her, shouldn’t you? |
Notice that the short answer repeats the modal, not the main verb. A small detail that sounds very natural when you get it right.
In practice you do not choose a modal by its name, but by what you want to express. This is the table I would stick on the wall:
| What you want to express | Modal | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Ability (present) | can | I can drive. |
| Ability (past) | could | I could read at four. |
| Permission | can, could, may | May I come in? |
| Request | can, could, would | Could you repeat that? |
| Obligation | must, have to | You must wear a helmet. |
| Prohibition | mustn’t, can’t | You mustn’t park here. |
| No obligation | needn’t, don’t have to | You don’t have to come. |
| Advice | should, ought to | You should rest. |
| Possibility | may, might, could | It might rain later. |
| Deduction (almost certainly yes) | must | She must be tired. |
| Deduction (certainly not) | can’t | That can’t be true. |
| Offer or suggestion | shall, can | Shall I help you? |
| Past habit | would, used to | We would play in the street. |
| Prediction | will | It will be sunny tomorrow. |
Present ability, informal permission, general possibility and requests. It is the most frequent modal of all.
The negative is can’t, and in formal contexts cannot, always as one word. The full topic, be able to included, is in my guide to can, could and be able to.
The past of can for general abilities, a polite request, and possibility in the present or future.
Two warnings straight from Cambridge. First: for one specific achievement in the past you do not use could but was able to or managed to (I was able to buy the tickets, not «I could buy the tickets»). Second: could does not give permission. If someone asks Could I leave early?, the answer is Yes, you can, never «Yes, you could».
Possibility and formal permission. It is the modal of signs, announcements and requests in a suit.
Careful with the negative: it is written may not, and the contraction «mayn’t» does not exist.
Possibility, usually a little more remote than may, although in today’s English the difference is very thin.
Might is not used for ability: that is can or could.
Two uses that should not be mixed up: obligation (coming from the speaker) and deduction (you are almost certain).
And here is one of the most repeated errors Cambridge documents: must has no past. For past obligation you use had to: When she got home, she had to cook dinner, not «she must cook dinner». Nor is must used for predictions about the future: that is what will is for.
The most formal and the least frequent, but very much alive in two situations: offers and suggestions with I and we.
What shall does not do is give advice. That is should: In my opinion, we should book another hotel, not «we shall book another hotel».
Advice, recommendation and reasonable expectation.
Ought to means practically the same and sounds slightly more formal: You ought to apologise. It is far less common, especially in negatives and questions.
Predictions, spontaneous decisions, offers and promises.
Cambridge flags a very typical error here: using the present simple where will belongs. It is I’ll help you with that suitcase, not «I help you with that suitcase». The whole future is explained in my guide to will, going to and the present continuous.
Hypothetical situations, very polite requests, preferences and past habits.
Careful with that last use: would works for repeated actions in the past, but not for states. For states you use used to: I used to live in Melbourne, not «I would live in Melbourne».
And there are fixed expressions with would where will does not fit: Would you like…?, Would you mind…?, Would you rather…?.
This is the use that earns most marks from B2 upwards, and the one explained worst almost everywhere. When you do not know something for sure but you have a good idea, English does not say «I think»: it changes the modal. And each modal marks a different degree of certainty.
| Certainty | Modal | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 100% certain, yes | is / are | She is at home. |
| Almost certain, yes | must | She must be at home. Her car is outside. |
| Possible | may / might / could | She may be at home. |
| Unlikely | might not | She might not be at home. |
| Almost certain, no | can’t | She can’t be at home. I’ve just seen her at work. |
Two details make all the difference. First: the opposite of must in deductions is can’t, not mustn’t. Mustn’t is prohibition, not deduction. Second: could works for possibility, but couldn’t does not work the same way; to negate a deduction you need can’t.
Since modals have no past of their own, English builds the past with modal + have + past participle. This is the structure that separates a B2 from a C1, and the one that earns most credit in writing. If participles are shaky, I have a guide to irregular verbs.
| Structure | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| must have + participle | An almost certain deduction about the past | She must have left early. |
| can’t have + participle | A negative deduction | He can’t have finished already. |
| may / might / could have + participle | Possibility in the past | They might have missed the train. |
| should have + participle | The right thing was not done (regret or reproach) | I should have studied more. |
| shouldn’t have + participle | Something was done that should not have been | You shouldn’t have said that. |
| could have + participle | It was possible and did not happen | We could have taken the train, but we drove. |
| needn’t have + participle | It was done, but there was no need | You needn’t have brought your laptop. |
And one pair that turns up in every exam: needn’t have done means you did it unnecessarily (You needn’t have cooked, we’ve already eaten), while didn’t need to do means there was no need and, usually, that you did not do it (I didn’t need to cook, so I ordered a pizza). A small nuance, a huge difference.
Besides the nine core modals, a group of verbs expresses the same ideas but is conjugated like ordinary verbs. Here they are; each one deserves an article of its own.
| Verb | What it expresses | Example |
|---|---|---|
| have to | Obligation, usually external (a rule, a timetable) | I have to wear a uniform at work. |
| don’t have to | No obligation | You don’t have to come if you’re tired. |
| be able to | Ability, where can cannot go | I’ll be able to help you tomorrow. |
| be allowed to | Permission | We aren’t allowed to use phones in class. |
| used to | Past habits and states that are no longer true | I used to live in Granada. |
| ought to | Advice, slightly more formal than should | You ought to apologise. |
| had better | Urgent advice, with an implied consequence | You’d better leave now or you’ll miss it. |
| would rather | Preference | I’d rather stay in tonight. |
| need | Necessity (as an ordinary verb, with to) | I need to have my hair cut. |
| be going to | Intention and prediction based on evidence | It’s going to rain. |
The difference people ask about most is must versus have to: with must, the obligation comes from the speaker (I must stop smoking); with have to, it comes from outside (I have to wear a uniform). In the negative they are nothing alike: mustn’t is prohibition and don’t have to is freedom.
Every mistake in this table is taken from Cambridge’s own grammar pages, which flag incorrect forms drawn from the Cambridge English Corpus and from real candidate errors in their exams. This is not a list of what I happen to think: it is what actually goes wrong.
| ✘ Wrong | ✔ Right | Which rule it breaks |
|---|---|---|
| I don’t can believe it. | I can’t believe it. | Negatives take not, never do. |
| Do you could help me? | Could you help me? | Questions invert, never with do. |
| He can might hear the music. | He can hear the music. | Two modals cannot sit together. |
| She won’t can concentrate. | She won’t be able to concentrate. | After a modal, be able to. |
| I’d love to can see the Taj Mahal. | I’d love to be able to see the Taj Mahal. | Modals have no infinitive. |
| They musted sell their house. | They had to sell their house. | Modals have no past form. |
| When she got home, she must cook dinner. | When she got home, she had to cook dinner. | Must does not express past obligation. |
| The children can not be left alone. | The children cannot be left alone. | Cannot is written as one word. |
| They can see a light on as they drove past. | They could see a light on as they drove past. | Past ability takes could. |
| I could buy a wonderful bag. | I was able to / managed to buy a wonderful bag. | A specific past achievement, not general ability. |
| A: Could I leave early? B: Yes, you could. | B: Yes, you can. | Could does not grant permission. |
| Although you might visit these places… | Although you can visit these places… | Might does not express ability. |
| We mayn’t know yet. | We may not know yet. | «Mayn’t» does not exist. |
| In my opinion, we shall book another hotel. | In my opinion, we should book another hotel. | Shall does not give advice. |
| The cards shall be ready at the end of the month. | The cards will be ready at the end of the month. | Shall only with I and we. |
| I help you with that suitcase. | I’ll help you with that suitcase. | Offers take will, not the present simple. |
| I would live in Melbourne when I was a kid. | I used to live in Melbourne when I was a kid. | Would does not work for past states. |
| Will you like your steak well cooked? | Would you like your steak well cooked? | Fixed expressions with would. |
| We don’t ought to have ordered so much. | We ought not to have ordered so much. | Ought to does not use do either. |
| We are used to go to the seaside. | We used to go to the seaside. | Used to takes no be in front of it. |
| I need have my hair cut. | I need to have my hair cut. | The ordinary verb need takes to. |
| I think the bill could expensive. | I think the bill could be expensive. | A modal needs a verb after it. |
Look down the list and you will see that almost all of them fall into three boxes: putting do where it does not belong, trying to conjugate a verb that does not conjugate, and picking the modal with the wrong meaning. With that in mind, you start spotting them as you speak.
They appear at every level, but they are not tested in the same way.
The basics, done well: can for ability and permission, must and have to for obligation, should for advice. In the speaking test they come out by themselves as soon as you are asked what you can do or what the rules are at your school or workplace.
This is where deductions come in (must be, can’t be) along with perfect modals, and above all where they appear in Part 4 of the Reading and Use of English paper, the famous key word transformations. Three examples in exactly the style you will get:
At the higher levels the form is taken for granted and the nuance is tested: needn’t have done against didn’t need to do, should have done for regret, and emphatic structures with inversion such as Not only could they finish on time, but they also…. At that point it is not about getting it right, but about sounding natural.
| Modal | Main uses | Past |
|---|---|---|
| can | Ability, permission, general possibility, requests | could / was able to |
| could | Past ability, polite request, possibility, suggestion | could have + participle |
| may | Possibility, formal permission | may have + participle |
| might | More remote possibility, soft suggestion | might have + participle |
| must | Obligation from the speaker, almost certain deduction, prohibition in the negative | had to / must have + participle |
| shall | Offers and suggestions with I and we, legal register | — |
| should | Advice, expectation | should have + participle |
| will | Prediction, spontaneous decision, offer, promise | would |
| would | Hypothesis, formal request, preference, past habit | would have + participle |
Nine core modals: can, could, may, might, will, shall, would, should and must. Alongside them are the semi-modals (dare, need, ought to, used to) and verbs with modal meanings (have to, be going to, be able to).
Because two modals cannot follow one another. You say I will be able to.
With must the obligation comes from the speaker; with have to, from an external rule. And in the negative they part company completely: mustn’t forbids, don’t have to frees you.
Mustn’t is not used in deductions: the opposite of must be is can’t be. Mustn’t only expresses prohibition.
They have no past form of their own. You use modal + have + participle (must have gone, should have studied) or an equivalent verb (had to, was able to).
Both express possibility and today they are almost interchangeable. Might tends to sound slightly less likely, and may slightly more formal, especially for permission.
Forty sentences to check that all of the above has sunk in. Below you will find four interactive exercises that mark themselves, so you will know straight away how you did. The third one is special: every incorrect sentence is a real learner error documented by Cambridge.
And if you prefer a version in text that you can copy and paste, you have it down here 👇
Choose the correct modal verb in each sentence.
Complete the sentences with the modal verb in brackets + have + past participle.
Decide whether each sentence is correct or incorrect, and rewrite the incorrect ones.
Complete the second sentence so that it means the same as the first, using the word in capitals.
Modal verbs are not learnt by heart, they are learnt through what they mean. If you keep three ideas: they do not conjugate and they do not take do; for the past you need modal + have + participle or an equivalent such as had to; and in deductions the scale runs from must to can’t, through may, might and could.
This guide is the starting point of a series: every important modal will get its own article, beginning with can, could and be able to, which is already published. Next will come must and have to, then should, then may and might, and the semi-modals in full.
Did you find this post useful? Share it with other students and teachers of English. And if you would like more content like this, subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram and YouTube.
See you in the next post. Until then, don’t forget to keep smiling! 🙂